MM.net Banner

Not the MSM you're used to

My Mug
Me

e-mail
matthewsmaynard at gmail dot com
 

February 2005

S M T W Th F St
<< 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 >>

Google

Google MM.net

GreyMatter Archives
Beginning End

Blogroll
Friends & Family
JenBlog - The Wife
Jeremy Gilby
Chris the Bro-in-law

Favorites
James Lileks
Boots & Sabers
VodkaPundit
Commissar
Pejmanesque
Publicola
Cowboy Blob
Anthroblogology

Milbloggers
Lt. Smash
Donovan
Blackfive
American Soldier
Mudville Gazette
Froggy Ruminations

The Replacement Media
PowerLine
Cap'n's Qs
Michelle Malkin
LGF

Editorials
NRO
Weekly Standard
Cox & Forkum

Radio Shows
Ingraham
Hewitt

Newsreels
Fox News
Drudge

Comics
User Friendly
PVP Online
Day by Day

Other
APOD

Tucson Blogring
< # Homepage ? >

February 14th, 2005

Biblical Archaeology - I did some research this weekend, and I can conclusively determine the site referred to in the parable of the sower - specifically, the field with rocky soil.

It's my backyard.

We bought two rose plants at Home Depot (a.k.a. The Money Pit) and tried to plant them Sunday afternoon. We couldn't dig deeper than an inch or two before we hit a rock that had to be removed, with much consternation and shovel-wielding. Fortunately we had a pick I had borrowed from a friend, so the digging went fairly fast after we got that. Eventually we had a hole about a foot and a half deep into which we could put some good soil.

Planting is the one home improvement that requires a lack of trust in your own skills. Once the plant is in the ground, you just have to water it. Beyond that, you have to rely on God. Its quite a good activity for building trust in the Almighty.


This is my rifle - In 1938 Melvin M. Johnson, Jr. was a Marine Corps Officer intent on developing a rifle that the Military could use. As an observer at the Springfield Armory he noted some flaws in the Garand and Pederson designs that he thought he could remedy.

The result, refined over the next two years, was a semiautomatic, recoil operated rifle capable of a rate if fire equal to that of the Garand and almost 10% more accurate (in one test - in another, the Garand just barely beat the Johnson). The Army, however, decided to keep the M1 Garand, since it was already in production and it was a faster to reload. After the second round of tests in 1940 Melvin changed the name of the rifle to "model of 1941". The Dutch, having been overrun by the Nazis, were very keen to equip their Military in the East Indies with a rifle. Production was begun in Rhode Island. Unusually, the caliber was .30-06, the American standard, instead of the Dutch standard 8mm Mauser.

The U.S. Marines found some use for the new rifle as well. It was lightweight and easy to break down and reassemble, which made for an ideal paratrooper rifle. Although it had its good points (very low recoil, reloading easier than with the Garand) it also had problems that couldn't be addressed as easily (many small parts that were easy to lose and incompatible with the Garand). A light machine gun version, fed from a side-protruding magazine, was also produced.

Between all purchasers a total of approximately 30,000 rifles were completed, with spare parts enough for more than twice as many. There were eventually sold off to Winchester and Numrich Corp., then to Winfield, who imported them back to the US and sold them off as sportsman's arms. Today most of the rifles are in the hands of collectors. Occasionally one will come up for sale, fetching in the neighborhood of $3,000 or more.

More info than can be reasonably condensed on this page can be found here.


Crickets - So I found out Saturday morning that Eason Jordan resigned. "Hmmm," thinketh I, "I wonder which lefty bloggers are covering this." I check Kos, Josh Marshall, Eschaton - nothing but the silence that had emanated from Atlanta for two weeks previous.

Jonah Goldberg put it best:

I also think this illustrates something very significant about the comparative successes of the Leftwing bloggers and the rightwing bloggers. The righty blogs have taken down Dan Rather and Eason Jordan. That is big game. The lefty blogs got this Talon news guy. I don't think this has anything to do with the skills on one side or the other. Give the lefty side credit, they're smart and they're tenacious. They're just as good at digging up old quotes, finding inconsistencies etc. as the guys on the right. In some cases they may even be better. So at that level there's really no difference. But when it comes to going after the mainstream media they really don't have the taste for it. Why is that? Well, the obvious reason is that they don't particularly disagree with the stuff the Dan Rathers and Eason Jordans say or do. Sure they may tear apart a bad poll or criticize a quote out of context if it suits their purposes. But at the end of the day, at the macro level, the fact is that the lefty bloggers and the Mainstream Media are on the same side of things. That is an important distinction which will drive the story of the blogs versus the MSM for years to come.

Amen. (Right Wing) Blogosphere 2, Big Media 0. The lynch mob theme being run around the Big Media outlets is baseless because (a) the accusations have been corroborated by several eyewitnesses and (b) CNN, possessing the tape, has not made it public.

The topic of discussion at which Eason made his infamous comments was "Will Democracy Survive the Media?". I think the answer is a most resounding yes. However, to quote from Rony Abovitz, the blogger who broke the story,

I believe that bloggers need to maintain a very high level of ethics, morality, and credibility if the medium is to be taken seriously. It could be that blogging may be taken more seriously than the traditional media because there is no need to answer to a corporate financial master. The potential is there, but a level of peer review comments and content quality needs to be there as well.

Keep it honest, and we'll keep it trusted.

Toys
Site Meter


Current Homeland Security Alert Level

Hand over the cash and no bytes get hurt.

CPU Brain Candy


Valid XHTML 1.0

Listed on BlogShares

Technorati Profile

Ads: No endorsement should be presumed

This site is copyright 2001-2005 by Matthew Maynard. All rights reserved. All your trademarks, copyrights, insignia, and other distinguishing characteristics are belong to you. Sharks in suits make for good joke material. Don't leave a mess on your way out.

Links to external websites are valid at the time of article authoring and may decay as time goes by. But we'll always have Paris.

The opinions on this site are those of their author and do not represent anyone else's views. That is, unless and until you agree with them, at which point they become yours as well. Opinions expressed in the comments belong to the comment poster and may be edited for content. Play nice with others, since you want them to play nice with you.